Is this a small divergence of visions or a major philosophical issue?

Recently Space Renaissance International went through a two months discussion, in a tentative to unify our efforts with some colleagues, since a few years organized in the International Lunar Decade group. The envisaged new alliance was to be called ‘Global Space Renaissance’ (GSR).
However, such a tentative has aborted, after acknowledging a fundamental difference in the views of our two organizations.
One of the organizers of ILD wrote: “Our objectives cannot be accomplished by making statements that are considered unrealistic in timetable (…) We are definitely not an sole advocate of urgent human space settlements. Humans have not learned out to live sustainably on Earth and we need to learn this lesson before seeking to create settlements in space.”
After a quick email exchange, we both agreed to withdraw SRI from the GSR tentative.
I am aware that many could find bizarre to break a worth tentative of efforts unification between two space advocacy organizations due to a small divergence of visions. Couldn’t such different visions work together, for the sake of our shared ideals?
The first answer is yes, they could, if they would be allowed to hold the same priority.
Gregg Maryniak – interviewed by Corrinne Graham, for the Space Renaissance Academy Mentorship Programme
Corrinne Graham (Economic financial analyst, Space Renaissance USA) interviewed Gregg Maryniak, about his history, motivation and aims to inspire young generations to find their way to the outer space:
Gregg is the co-founder, together with Peter Diamandis, of the XPRIZE Foundation. The XPRIZE is recognized by the space community, as the initiative that triggered the New Space revolution, by demonstrating that private, commercial low cost access to space was feasible.
He was the Executive Vice President and Director of the Space Studies Institute, founded by Gerard O’Neill in Princeton US. He is Chairman of Space and Energy at Singularity University and keeps on restlessly working to inspire and motivate students and public opinion at large, explaining why human expansion into space is needed and very urgent, in order not to miss our “launch window”.
Sourav Karmakar interviewed by Bharathi Sharma and Sachika Bhatia for the Space Renaissance Academy Mentorship Programme
Sourav Karmakar, researcher on Soft & Flexible Robotics, for med-tech, defence & aerospace applications, hold TEDx talks about “Space For Everyone”.
Paul Ziolo, interviewed by Mika Curtis, for the Space Renaissance Academy Mentorship Programme.
Patrick Collins interviewed by Bharathi Sharma and Sachika Bhatia
Corrinne Graham interviews Howard Bloom
I am proud to announce an interview with Howard Bloom, space philosopher and writer, who kindly accepted to reply to some questions about his role of Mentor of the Space Renaissance Academy.
Humanity is not forced to choose among Earth and Space, yet
An article published by Lori Garver in 2019 proposed to “forget new crewed missions in space” and “NASA to focus on saving Earth.”
I thought such an extreme position was worth to be discussed, and strongly refuted.
No Lori. I strongly disagree with you.
I am not a US citizen, but NASA is a Planet Earth’s primary space agency, therefore i am speaking as a Planet Earth’s citizen.
I am not against taking care of planetary issues, that basically would mean to follow the UN 2030 17 SDGs. All initiatives that NASA and other major space agencies could undertake, to mitigate global issues, such as climate extreme phenomena, pollution, plastic in the sea, fighting against pandemics, are more than welcome, and should be pursued.
I am 100% in favor of active initiatives (opposite to passive de-growthist “solutions”), e.g. to build dams to protect coastal towns, and eventually use the water surplus (coming from ice melting) to claim deserts. Proper space technologies can be used to support such kind of active initiatives.
But we must be aware that none of the planetary global issues can be solved, none of the 17 SDGs can be achieved, without adding the 18th SDG: to kick-off civilian space development.
The Space Renaissance Academy Mentorship Programme
Space Renaissance Academy announced its worldwide Mentorship Programme.
The Space Renaissance Academy kicked-off a very ambitious initiative: to build the greatest planetary mentorship programme.
The programme is made by two main parts:
- Students have the possibility to choose their favorite themes for graduation theses or Ph.D works.
- Mentors have the possibility to choose their favorite disciplines, on which they like to provide mentorship to students.
The SR Academy will take care of creating the link among students and mentors, for the different themes / disciplines.
We will also contact Universities, in order to coordinate this beautiful effort.
Why did Space Renaissance engage in this adventure?
In this page, the meaning, the contents and the goals of the programme are explained in more details.
The Great Objection and its Confutation
Before going to space, should we solve the problems here, on Earth?
The need for growth
The management of scarce resources is possible only by despotic regimes
The only way is space industrialization